Knight v. Aviva: Tribunal Clarifies Billing Practices for Psychological Treatment
LAT Underscores Importance of Returning Settlement Funds Prior to Contesting Settlement
Proceeding with Litigation comes at a Cost
LAT’s One-Size-Fits-All Scheduling Approach Rejected by the Divisional Court
Impecuniosity is not an exception to full and final settlement
Tenuta v BelairDirect: A Critical Analysis of Catastrophic Impairment Assessments
Special Awards and Expert Evidence: Vivekanantham v. Certas Direct Insurance Company
Every Word Counts: Jazayeri v. Economical
Stay in Your Lane: Ontario Superior Court Decision Underlines the Importance of Proper Jurisdictional Channels in Accident Benefits Cases
Proposed SABS and Insurance Act Amendments Could Change How Auto Insurance Policies are Made and Paid Out
Pursuing CAT determination when only MIG limits have been exhausted
Applicants cannot bring premature applications for entitlement to catastrophic benefits that are not (yet) available to them
LAT Orders Case to be Reheard due to Original Decision Maker’s Failure to Identify Causation as a Key Issue by Daniel Hinds
LAT application a Nullity – Avoidable?
The LAT Cannot Decline to Consider Submissions at First Instance and Brand Them As Fresh Evidence In Reconsideration
Confirmation of employment does not automatically eliminate the need for an OCF-10 where IRB and NEB tests are met on an OCF-3
Medical Evidence Matters
Sur-reply will be granted by LAT in Written Hearings to Deal with New Evidence Submitted in Reply
Late NEB Claim not Excusable – Failure to Submit OCF 3 Bars Claim Prior to its Submission
Get It Right the First Time, Because Reply is Not a Second Kick at the Can
LAT Determines That Applying the CAT Definition as Outlined in the Legislation at the Time of the Accident is the Most “Harmonious Interpretation” by Adam Imtiaz
