LAT Determines That Applying the CAT Definition as Outlined in the Legislation at the Time of the Accident is the Most “Harmonious Interpretation” by Adam Imtiaz
The Updated LAT Rules: Which Rules apply as of August 21, and which Rules apply based on Date of Application/First Notice of CC by Karina Dziuba
Entitlement to attendant care benefits requires an Applicant to establish the services were incurred
Psychological Injury Claim as a result of Family Member’s Injury Must Result from Physical Injury to Family Member Rather than Psychological Injury By Noah Beiles
Why the LAT does not have jurisdiction over repayment of settlement funds
LAT Orders Applicant to Pay $350 in Hearing Attendance Fees to Each IE Assessor She Summoned
Personal Testimony During a Hearing is Important, but at the LAT – Impairments Must be Supported by Evidence by Joshua Edmunds and Sawarn Benning
Be careful what you Motion for: Frivolous and vexatious behaviour at the LAT can cost you
LAT Adjudicator Concludes Applicant Unable to Add Issues in Dispute Too Close to the Hearing Date
The Licence Appeal Tribunal’s Application of Res Judicata in the MIG Context
LAT Adjudicator Finds That Technical Deficiencies in a Settlement Disclosure Notice Do Not Provide an Automatic Right to Rescind 20-year Old Settlement Agreement
LAT Adjudicator Concludes that the LAT Lacks Jurisdiction to Amend FSCO Orders
Ontario Court of Appeal Finds Medical Reason Is Not Required to Terminate IRBs
What is an Insurer’s Potential Exposure and Responsibilities Beyond the 260-week Post-Accident Mark? Han v. Wawanesa
First Decision of Its Kind on How to Calculate Post 65 IRB when Collaterals Paid to Age 65 Rescinded: Schuknecht v Economical
Weekly Benefits Claim Barred by Breach of S.55
Premature Appeal to Divisional Court from the LAT: JR vs Appeals
The Divisional Court Brings Greater Clarity to the Term Employed under s. 5(1) of the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule
EI Sickness Benefits are Deductible from IRBS
Failing to Elect a Benefit Under the SABS May Bar an Applicant from Proceeding with a Claim
Compliant Notice to Self-Represented Claimant does not need to be Re-Served and Limitation Clock does not Re-Start When Counsel Subsequently Retained
