A Finding of Catastrophic Impairment does not Automatically Deem Denied Payments Prior to a Declaration of CAT to be Deemed Incurred
LAT finds Surgically Implanted Prosthesis Should be Turned Off for Rating Catastrophic Impairments Under AMA Guides
Procedural Issues involving Expert Witnesses – Excluding, Deemed Undertaking Rule and Scope of Expertise: Crecoukias v Toronto Transit Commission by Julia Cohen
GOS-E Is Not an Automatic Admission into CAT Funding: Adams v. Federated Insurance Company of Canada, 2022 ONLAT 20-009293/AABS by Karina Dziuba
LAT Finds CAT Designation Restricted to those Persons Directly Involved in an Accident under Pre-June, 2016 SABS.
Superior Court Rules SPECT Scan Evidence Inadmissible
Procedural Fairness in GCS Score for Catastrophic Impairment Analysis Requires Collateral Evidence to be Allowed
A Denial of Pre-104 Attendant Care Benefits does not Start the Limitation Period Clock for Post-104 Attendant Care Benefits
Shooing Away Applications for Unreasonable CAT Assessments: R.M. v. Certas By: Aryeh Samuel and Melia Muboyayi
What Does “With” Mean when it comes to the CAT Definition Related to Traumatic Brain Injury by Arijana B. Schrauwen
2014 Amendment for Incurred Accident Benefits Applies to Earlier Accidents
Doctrine of Discoverability Applies: Tomec v. Economical
Treating Experts Cannot Meet with Insurer To Prepare to Give Evidence at a Hearing
How Much is Too Much to Charge in Fees on an AB Cashout
CAT Assessment Costs Are Excluded From the Non-CAT Entitlement Limit by Gordon Lee
How Much Attendant Care is Enough Attendant Care? LAT Considerations for CAT Applicants Arijana B. Schrauwen
Late Claim By Insured for Retroactive Attendant Care Allowed with Interest: 18-000790 v. Jevco Insurance Co.
CAT IEs: How Many is Too Many?
Status of Being an Insured Person Comes from SABS Definitions and Nowhere Else: 18-001020 v Wawanesa
Trials and Tribulations in Getting a Defence Medical Exam: Rintjema v TD Home
Denying Attendant Care as Not Incurred Fraught With Difficulty if Provider Trained as PSW Even if Not So Employed: A Study of Two LAT Decisions
