Rome Wasn’t the Only Thing Burning: Medical Marijuana and Fire Loss Claims: Nero v Allstate
LAT Determines That Applying the CAT Definition as Outlined in the Legislation at the Time of the Accident is the Most “Harmonious Interpretation” by Adam Imtiaz
The Updated LAT Rules: Which Rules apply as of August 21, and which Rules apply based on Date of Application/First Notice of CC by Karina Dziuba
Passage of Time Does not End Causation Analysis or Duty of Care Considerations where Negligence May Still be Active Cause of Injury: Case v. Pattison, 2023 ONCA 529
Entitlement to attendant care benefits requires an Applicant to establish the services were incurred
Psychological Injury Claim as a result of Family Member’s Injury Must Result from Physical Injury to Family Member Rather than Psychological Injury By Noah Beiles
Why the LAT does not have jurisdiction over repayment of settlement funds
“Regular Use” Gets Expansive Application in Priority Dispute by Noah Beiles
LAT Orders Applicant to Pay $350 in Hearing Attendance Fees to Each IE Assessor She Summoned
Personal Testimony During a Hearing is Important, but at the LAT – Impairments Must be Supported by Evidence by Joshua Edmunds and Sawarn Benning
Ontario Court of Appeal Overturns Dismissal for Delay by Adam Imtiaz
Concerns of Costs and Efficiency Not Enough to Strike a Jury Notice in Recent Decision by Noah Beiles
Challenging Testamentary Capacity
Be careful what you Motion for: Frivolous and vexatious behaviour at the LAT can cost you
LAT Adjudicator Concludes Applicant Unable to Add Issues in Dispute Too Close to the Hearing Date
The Licence Appeal Tribunal’s Application of Res Judicata in the MIG Context
LAT Adjudicator Finds That Technical Deficiencies in a Settlement Disclosure Notice Do Not Provide an Automatic Right to Rescind 20-year Old Settlement Agreement
LAT Adjudicator Concludes that the LAT Lacks Jurisdiction to Amend FSCO Orders
Ontario Court of Appeal Finds Medical Reason Is Not Required to Terminate IRBs
What is an Insurer’s Potential Exposure and Responsibilities Beyond the 260-week Post-Accident Mark? Han v. Wawanesa
First Decision of Its Kind on How to Calculate Post 65 IRB when Collaterals Paid to Age 65 Rescinded: Schuknecht v Economical
