Reasonable Apprehension of Bias at FSCO: Yang and Co-Operators by Dagmara Mroczkowska
The Continued Use of OCF 9 Forms after they were Discontinued by Superintendent Led to Invalid Refusal of Benefits: Delegate Evans in Bharat v State Farm
To Bifurcate or Not To Bifurcate – That is the Question: Robichaud et al. v. Constantinidis
Court of Appeal Finds Nothing Funny in Letting Insured George Carlin Get Windfall $100K Over Actual Loss: Gore Mutual Insurance v. Carlin, 2018 ONCA 628 by Sean Valentine
Court of Appeal Upholds Decision to Maintain Administrative Dismissal, Clarifies Application of Rules 48.15 Since Repealed by Devon McIntyre
Supreme Court of Canada Revisits the Duty of Care: Rankin (Rankin’s Garage & Sales) v. J.J. (2018 SCC 19) by Dagmara Mroczkowska
Reasonableness Standard Applied by Court of Appeal Even Where Parties Agree to Correctness Standard in Arbitration Agreement
Lessons From the Court of Appeal: A Driver’s Standard of Care During a Drug Deal And Summary Judgment With A Limited Evidentiary Record
Court Of Appeal Applies Reasonableness Standard Of Review To Arbitral Decisions Resolving Priority Disputes Between Insurers
No Analogous Care; Professional Attendant Care Providers Have To Be the Real Deal: Terranova and Economical by Lauren Furukawa
Court Of Appeal Weighs In On Municipal Standard Of Care For Roadways, Application Of Section 4 Of The Negligence Act, And Application Of Statutory Discount Rate by Nicholas Carmichael
I won! Making Sense of a Jury Verdict in the Changing World of Personal Injury Law
Causation Test For Accident Benefits IS The “But For” Test: FSCO Director Decision
Court of Appeal Says: Ours is Not to Reason Why, Ours is Just to Show Up to the EUO
First LAT Appeal to the Divisional Court Applies the Reasonableness Standard of Review to a MIG Determination
The Standard of Review: Pretty Soon Someone Will Get Tired of Reviewing This
Supreme Court of Canada Says That Diagnosis and Expert Evidence Not Required For Finding of Compensable Mental Injury by Amanda Lo Cicero
The Limits of Good Faith Obligations: Usanovic v. Pencorp Life Insurance Company
Judicial Interventions During a Trial – How Far is Too Far?: Cannon v. Cemcor Apartments Inc., 2017 ONCA 378
Perfection Is Not Required: ONCA finds that strict compliance with s.227(1) of the Insurance Act Is Not Required For An Excluded Driver Endorsement by Danielle Malone
Implied Consent for 15 Year Old Not Easily Established: Conners v. D’Angelo by Nicholas Carmichael
