416-777-2811

Accessibility

  • Accessible Client Service Policy
  • Accessibility Policies
  • Feedback
  • Notice Of Disruption To Services

Location

Zarek Taylor Grossman Hanrahan LLP
480 University Ave, Suite 900
Toronto, ON
M5G 1V2
[email protected]
Top 10
  • Home
  • About The Firm
  • Services
  • People
  • Insights
  • Community
  • Private Arbitration Database
  • Careers
  • Contact

Copyright © 2016-2023 ZTGH Zarek Taylor Grossman Hanrahan

Copyright © 2016-2023 ZTGH Zarek Taylor Grossman Hanrahan

  • Home
  • Insights

Blogs

  • All
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts & Videos
  • Estate Litigation Resources
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Newsletters
    • All
    • Blogs
    • Podcasts & Videos
    • Estate Litigation Resources
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Newsletters
Blogs

When Can “Big Brother” Be Watching You ….and Not Tell You about It? by Chantalle J. Youkhana

When Can “Big Brother” Be Watching You ….and Not Tell You about It? by Chantalle J. Youkhana
Apr 03, 2019
Blogs

After The Event Insurance: Who Gets The Proceeds? Peter B. Cozzi Professional Corporation v. Szot, 2019 ONSC 1274 by Leah Dick

After The Event Insurance: Who Gets The Proceeds? Peter B. Cozzi Professional Corporation v. Szot, 2019 ONSC 1274 by Leah Dick
Mar 11, 2019
Blogs

CAT IEs: How Many is Too Many?

CAT IEs: How Many is Too Many?
Feb 28, 2019
Blogs

But For Misstating the Test – “But For” is the Causation Test for Accident Benefits: Sabadash v State Farm

Blogs

Ignore LAT Rules and Case Conference Orders on Production Timelines at Your Peril: 18-005028 v. Allstate

SONYA M. KATRYCZ
SONYA M. KATRYCZ
Feb 04, 2019
Blogs

Unlike Peter Pan, In the World of Insurance, People Do Grow Up: Adult Children Are Not Members of the Household

SONYA M. KATRYCZ
SONYA M. KATRYCZ
Feb 04, 2019
Blogs

Slip and Falls on Public Property: Are you an Occupier? Janssen v. William and Markle Jewellers Ltd. Clarifies by Leah Dick

Slip and Falls on Public Property: Are you an Occupier? Janssen v. William and Markle Jewellers Ltd. Clarifies by Leah Dick
Jan 28, 2019
Blogs

Resolute Advocacy Requires Submissions by Counsel at Least to Have a Reasonable Basis or Be Made in Good Faith

Resolute Advocacy Requires Submissions by Counsel at Least to Have a Reasonable Basis or Be Made in Good Faith
Dec 31, 2018
Blogs

No “Do-Overs” For Priority Acceptance By Sophisticated Insurer Litigants: The Case of Pembridge Insurance Co. v. Sovereign General Insurance Co.

No “Do-Overs” For Priority Acceptance By Sophisticated Insurer Litigants: The Case of Pembridge Insurance Co. v. Sovereign General Insurance Co.
Dec 24, 2018
Blogs

Zone of Privacy Extends Litigation Privilege To Active Claims Even When One “Dispute” Resolves: M.D. v. Aviva by Greg Specht

Zone of Privacy Extends Litigation Privilege To Active Claims Even When One “Dispute” Resolves: M.D. v. Aviva by Greg Specht
Dec 24, 2018
Appellate

Silos Replace Apples: Treatment of Collateral Benefit Deductions in the Court of Appeal

Blogs

An Occupational Hazard For Truck Drivers: Underinsurance by Chantalle Youkhana

An Occupational Hazard For Truck Drivers: Underinsurance by Chantalle Youkhana
Nov 13, 2018
Director’s Delegate Overturns FSCO Arbitrator and Confirms that MIG is Constitutional: Abyan v Sovereign by Amanda Lo Cicero
Blogs

Director’s Delegate Overturns FSCO Arbitrator and Confirms that MIG is Constitutional: Abyan v Sovereign by Amanda Lo Cicero

Director’s Delegate Overturns FSCO Arbitrator and Confirms that MIG is Constitutional: Abyan v Sovereign by Amanda Lo Cicero
Oct 24, 2018
Blogs

Does an Improper Cancellation of an Insurance Policy Stay in Force Perpetually: CAO Says Not on the Facts of this Case

Blogs

Status of Being an Insured Person Comes from SABS Definitions and Nowhere Else: 18-001020 v Wawanesa

Commercial Litigation

Discoverability and Claims for Contribution and Indemnity

SHANTI BARCLAY
SHANTI BARCLAY
Oct 09, 2018
Blogs

Reasonable and Necessary? A Closer Look at 17-006160 v Aviva Canada

Reasonable and Necessary? A Closer Look at 17-006160 v Aviva Canada
Oct 04, 2018
Blogs

Implied Consent Not Easily Established – Leigh and Michaud-Shields by Greg Specht

Implied Consent Not Easily Established – Leigh and Michaud-Shields by Greg Specht
Sep 11, 2018
Blogs

Alleging that Insurer Is Trying to Bolster its Denial for a Hearing is Not Sufficient Reason for Refusing an Insurer Examination: LAT Decision 17-002973 by Hesam Motevalli

Alleging that Insurer Is Trying to Bolster its Denial for a Hearing is Not Sufficient Reason for Refusing an Insurer Examination: LAT Decision 17-002973 by Hesam Motevalli
Aug 30, 2018
Blogs

Regional Senior Justice Dismisses Plaintiff’s Attempt at Excluding Potential Jurors Who Drive and Pay for Automobile Insurance: Kapoor v. Kuzmanovski, 2018 ONSC 4770 by Nora Refai

Regional Senior Justice Dismisses Plaintiff’s Attempt at Excluding Potential Jurors Who Drive and Pay for Automobile Insurance: Kapoor v. Kuzmanovski, 2018 ONSC 4770 by Nora Refai
Aug 24, 2018
Appellate

A Diagnosis of Chronic Pain is not on its own Sufficient to Take A Claimant out of The MIG

EVAN A. ARGENTINO
EVAN A. ARGENTINO
Aug 23, 2018
« Prev 1 … 11 12 13 14 15 … 22 Next »

Newsletter Subscribe

Select list(s) to subscribe to


By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: . You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact
416-777-2811

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About The Firm
  • Services
  • People
  • Insights
  • Community
  • Private Arbitration Database
  • Careers
  • Contact

Accessibility

  • Accessible Client Service Policy
  • Accessibility Policies
  • Feedback
  • Notice Of Disruption To Services

Useful links

  • Terms And Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap

Copyright © 2016-2023 ZTGH Zarek Taylor Grossman Hanrahan

Website by Pixelcarve